TTW4 posted a photo:
03.11.09 NEWS: This morning I was awoken, as is often the case by BBC Radio 4. Radio 4s AM Prog annonnced to it's audience via an 'officer' of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, CEOPC, that we were all to look out for Madeleine Mccann. I am serious. This is not a joke.
He was quite specific in his request. He did say 'the child' and not 'the body'. The Mccanns in their perpetuation of what, to me, appears as a total nonsense, have now found the time right to release yet more pictures of their dead daughter. CEOPC was the organisation that asked us all to send in our Praia Da Luz holiday pictures for analysis. This was to see if they could identify any known child pedos or abductors in the background either eyeing up Madeleine for a grab or lurking in the bushes waiting for their moment to strike. Sadly I was not in Luz on May the 3rd, but I do have a submission to make to CEOPC - the two pictures above.
We were told Madeleines skin is now darker, how they know this I know not, perhaps she has been on holiday to a sunny country. This we were led to believe, but this I hasten to add, we were not told. Looking at the pictures it does seem that in Madeleines is sporting a new tan. I am at a loss to know what we should believe of people who say such things, people who claim to have our childrens welfare at heart.
Is this really news? The fact that the Mccanns choose to continue in their desire for us all to believe in their version of the nights events on May the 3rd 2007. Is this something the BBC can report as news today ? Such preferential skewing of the truth by the BBC is now no longer simply an innocent enthusiasm or stretching of the truth, it is now testing any innocent observers credulity in the Mccanns themselves, to breaking point. The BBC are in danger, as much as the Mccanns, I fear, of overegging this particular pudding.
From the outset the Mccanns have been canny and some might say a little sparing with the whole truth. The al fresco 'back garden dining' extravaganza in which the press indulged us for months was a case in point. Here distances between the tapas bar and the apartment became variable and elastic in the extreme. They were no longer fixed places in space and time. They were suddenly free of all physical properties and made to magicly appear and disappear at random distances one from the other almost as frequently and equally as magicly, as Tanner and O'Brien, members of the Tapas7, found it necessary to suddenly leave the tapas bar table that night.
In case you are new to all this and you are not a regular reader of all things Mccann, this activity was something Tanner and O'Brien, Kate and Gerrys friends, did alot of that night, but they don't like to talk about it. One thing both they and the press do like to talk about is the abductor. The abductor that Tanner saw.
When Tanner was asked by the police as to what she had seen on just one of her journeys that night Tanner replied that she had seen people. This was true. It was only true however that after Tanner had made one of these ephemeral trips Tanner recounted the tale of seeing people. After that we were all thrown in at the deep end.
Tanner said she saw people and persons whom she could not have really have seen. People who were not really there at all. People who said they did not see her, despite Tanner being within 5 meters of one of the persons whom she claimed she saw. Nevertheless Tanner, never the fantasist as she reminded us, persisted.
She said she saw these other persons as clearly as you or I might spy another person across a room, and she added, of this, she was in no doubt. 6 months after Tanners first statement to police Tanner elaborated with detail concerning her sightings. Detail she had inexplicably left out from the statements she had earlier given to the police.
The very first sighting was of 'Eggman' - the man with no face or body, the next shortly thereafter was 'Bundlemen' - the man who was going the 'wrong way' initially*, but still had 2007s essential accoutrement, a bundle, perhaps even possibly a child, in his arms. *Once Murat had been placed in the frame and made an official suspect it was decided that 'Bundlemans' direction of travel had to be reversed. This was necessary as Murats mothers house was not in the direction of the church.
'Bundlemans' first described direction of travel was quickly moved from heading from north to south, down towards the town and the sea front, to walking across the top of the road that Tanner was, herself, walking up.
In this one move Tanner had removed Jeremy Wilkins and Gerry Mccann from the sighting. Now should they be questionned by police as to wether or not they too had seen 'Bundleman' they could honestly reply they had not seen the man as they had been in conversation and had their backs to this junction. All this despite the fact that Wilkins admitted he still could not see Tanner, who by this time was barely 5 metres across the road from where he and Gerry Mccann were gathered.
Bundleman was now to be seen travelling in a west to east direction. Finally he was heading in the right direction IE. towards Casa Liliana, Murats mothers house.
Finally only Tanner had seen him. And most finally of all, we now only have Tanners word, the word of an invisible woman, to believe on the existence or not of an abductor who she claims she saw carrying off, what might to her, have appeared to have been, a body which she then thought, a full 6 months later, might well be that of Madeleine McCann.
At the time, Tanners initial reports to the police of 'Eggman', and then the revised 'Bundleman' sighting was extremely helpful to the Mccanns. By the time that 'Bundleman' had made his appearence Murat had already been made a suspect.
This was thanks in no small part to the detective expertise of Clarence Mitchell, the Mccanns media spokesman. After revision of 'Bundlemans ' direction of travel it rather neatly appeared that Murats mothers house now lay directly in the new direction of travel. It all now seemed to fit, and the media, through Clarence Mitchell, had played no small part in bringing it about.
Tanners 3rd description of the abductor was far more detailed and well remembered than the two she had earlier given to the police. Tanner first told only the Mccanns of her sighting and not the police, but even then she told the Mccanns not immediately. It was only after several days had passed that Tanner could be coaxed to tell the police of her 1st description. Doubtless the welcome appearance of any abductor, even 'Eggman' must have been a source of great relief to Kate and Gerrry Mccann who up to that point in time had been treated by the police as the No1 and No2 suspects in their daughters disappearence. The Mccanns had been at their wits end. The police didn't seem to believe their story and they had been extensively and thoroughly helping police with their inquiries down at the Portimao nick.
'Eggman' was called 'Eggman ' because Tanners description of the man was so vague so much so as to be laughable. No one, least of all the Portuguese police ever came close to taking Tanners evidence seriously - except the Mccanns, and the BBC, and Sky News and the rest of the British media. They took it all very seriously. The BBC and all the major news organisations even went so far as to reproduce 'Eggmans' head on their webpages.
Tanners third version of events, some 6 months later, came with the addition of minute detail such as the colour of the childs pjs, and wether or not the child had shoes on or not, detail she now recalled and added. Detail that had avoided her recall 6 months prior. Detail suddenly appearded in Tanners mind, which was now as pasture fresh and dew covered as the day she witnessed it.
Tanners memory exhibits all the characteristics of a bottled wine that is only fit for drinking 6 months after it has been bottled. Tanner memory was a marvel to behold. It defied science. It had improved with age. Given that we are now 2 and a half years further on I am secretly amazed that the mans blood type and DNA hasn't yet been spotted by the eagle eyed Tanner in her local high street and reported to the nearest newsagents.
An explanation for such behaviour by Tanner could be that it was thought by the Mccanns press spokesmen, Mitchell et al, that in order to persuade the more cynically inclined concerning Tanners Tales, she was told to think again about her recollections from that night. This in itself became a media event, for that is how it was advertised and trailed on the BBC, with 'new evidence' debuted on the BBC 'for the first time'. Evidence we were told was about to be broadcast which had been withheld from the police. I am at a complete loss to explain the actions of Tanner and the Mccanns or to explain how Tanners appearence on a BBC programme with new evidence was at all helpful to the official police investigation into what had happened to Madeleine McCann.
Surely the correct venue for such evidence was in the Portuguese police files and not on the airwaves of the BBC. Odd that such important evidence was not put in the first instance to the police and thereafter the press, that is what usually happens.
The news reports news. Traditionally at least the news is not in the habit of making its own subject matter. As to wether a dumbed down, loosley thrown together collection of ideas presented as a factual documentary programme can be considered a suitable venue for such important information, it is you the audience who must decide.
There was now a complete reversal of priorities. The venue for such evidence is a police station and not a TV station. The news or propoganda value of Tanners evidence in diverting attention from the newly Arguidised Mccanns was plainly considered as far more important than the small matter of advising the Portuguese police of crucial new evidence in an investigation that had, by that time, been ongoing for 6 months or more and at great expense in terms of manpower and resources. Bilton of the BBC was chosen as the messenger. Bilton a man of the media as opposed to a policeman, a man of justice. The interview room was replaced by the hotel room. All of this was far more comfortable for Tanner.
This was to be Tanners third and final version of the nights events. Events she claims to have witnessed. Upon watching Tanners performance on BBCs Panorama one really was left in no doubt as to which version of the truth Tanner was intent on telling. Why you might ask were there 3 versions of the truth? There were 3 versions as three versions were required. I am left in doubt that had a fourth been thought necessary then Tanner could have magicked up a fourth version as well.
Back to the night of the 3rd of May 2007 and Tanner and O'Brien along with the rest of the Tapas 7 were playing musical chairs. No sooner had one of them returned to the table than it was time for the next to leave. Of course we all remember O'Brien saying his child was sick, but do we all also remember the staff at the Ocean Club stating to police there had not been a request from any of the tapas crew for clean bed linen, towels or cleaning substances on that, or any other night during their stay. If O'Brien really had been tidying up after a sick child, a child of whom it was claimed was sick for the entire evening, he did so without the help of Ocean Club laundry or house keeping services.
On the 10th of October 2007 the new head of the Mccann investigation, Paulo Rebelo visited the Mccanns apartment as part of his root and branch reassement of the entire case. This event was witnessed by holiday makers at the complex, and this event was also reported in the British press.
Three plain clothed officers revisited the apartment, and they took a particular interest in the service area beneath the apartment itself. The service area is not a bedroom. The service area is not Tanner and O'Brien apartment, and the service area is not Robert Murats secret hideaway. The service area is the service area. I imagine the service area contains items one might expect to see in a hotel service area. They might be towels linen cleaning agents, paper rolls, refuse bags, black bags, and other items for the cleaning and disposing of the day to day rubbish generated by guests in the apartments.
The apartments in the complex all have maid service for cleaning and some laundry services. The same facilities are offered that any hotel resort of this kind might have for it's guests. After the police visit on the 10th of October 2007, it was not reported in the press as to their findings concerning the service area investigation they had conducted. Neither was it reported as to the significance the police placed upon such an investigation. The evidence the police were were looking for or considering, has remained a mystery and a secret from that day to this.
Tanner and O'Briens police statements reveal that their movements on the night of the 3rd of May exclude any mention of visiting apartment 5A, the Mccanns apartment. The whereabouts of Tanner and O'Brien on the night of May the 3rd did not appear to interest the press. It was not thought of as worthy as they refused to question the inconsistencies offered to them by witnesses concerning O'Briens whereabouts at the time Madeleine disappeared. The quizmistress was quite clear as to where her loyalties lied. Her loyalty concerning the movements of O'Brien were with the Mccanns, more specificaly they lay with Kate Mccann. Just as her bargain of trust determined it should.
By contrast to the lack of reporting this item of critical information received in the British press it is interesting to note there were reports spanning several months from May to December 2007 in which for some inexplicable reason the entire focus of the press was placed upon the distance between the tapas bar and the apartment. This was gyrating at somewhere between 20 metres and 250 metres. Whilst none knew the exact wherebouts of Tanner and O'Brien that evening, or what Tanner really saw when she was not seen by anyone else, this dark cloud of suspicion was never placed under anything like the intense scrutiny that the distance between the apartment and the tapas table was by the press.
If this was all a diversion it was a good one. Again it was that media manipulation allowed such disfigurement and contortions to continue, and to influence not only the direction of the investigation but also the publics understanding of what was felt to be of significance.
Now that CEOPC have found their voice, they continue the chorus. With childrens welfare at stake they really should know better than to allow themselves to be drawn into such fast flowing and murky waters. CEOPC in furthering the Mccanns press campaigns and underpinning their house of cards had best take care, lest one day the whole crumbling ediface comes crashing down ontop of them.
All that can be said of those that act with such dubious motive is that they who stand by the Mccanns invariably do so for a reason, and that reason will not, as it has been shown not to in the past, bear public scrutiny. What is more, these supporters of gouls invariably have an agenda, it could be said they to march to a tune, as to who calls the tune we must now look to whomsoever it is that pays the piper.
TTW4 posted a photo:
The Madeleine Foundation was contacted, some time ago now, by a journalist with the name Christine Dolan, who claimed to have received one of Tony Bennetts leaflets. She said she was soon to be visiting the UK. Dolan proposed that both she and Bennett meet up as they appeared to share a mutual interest in the welfare of small children, and on that basis they might be of mutual benefit. Furthermore Dolan appeared to offer a much needed mainstream press exposure for the causes and aims of The Madeleine Foundation.
The Madeleine Foundation felt it would be prudent before arranging a meeting, to verify Dolans press contacts and pedigree. The exposure that Dolan promised, although much needed, was it seemed, an offer that might almost appear to be too good to be true. The mainstream press in the UK had made their position plain enough in that they would not now or in the forseeable future allow a platform for an non Mccann point of view in the case of Madeleine McCann.
An offer from a US respected mainstream TV journalist might just be what the campaign needed to level the playing field. With this in mind initial enquiries were made of press organisations and archives to substantiate Dolands legitimacy in the field of TV journalism and child welfare.
The first reports returned were not good:
1. Despite Dolans claims to recent employment in the US mainstream TV industry Dolan it transpired hadn't worked for CNN in over two decades
2. Dolans had established various charitable businesses or 'charities' which appear not to have tax free status - yet at the same time these organisations have not filed tax returns
3. Dolan has two default judgements against her, one for the misuse of $300,000 of donor funds; she has not challenged or appealed either decision in any way
4. She is major name dropped and will sue anyone and every one from Hillary Clinton down to accomplish her goals, these appear to be soley concerned with personal enrichment
5. Dolans helpers are a rogue’s gallery of English riff-raff and international swindlers, American 'news reporters' and 'producers', with a smattering of Hollywood B list names
6. Dolan, in 2004, teamed up with Pickett and Black. They got financial backing from Mary Grace of eSmart Technologies, and went on to form the 'Global Coalition'. Phillip Kronzer of The Kronzer Foundation - a philanthropic body targeting cults, (but as to quite what their true intentions are is not known) then sued the 'Global Coalition' for funds that he had advanced, namely $300,000. Immediately Black and Grace, without Dolan, went on to reform the Coalition into 'Children in Slavery' in November 2005. Phillip Kronzer’s lawsuit for $300,000 persists in Federal Court and Kronzer has vowed to get an accounting from Dolan and her cohorts for the money that he donated to their cause. Kronzer recalls that at a London meeting with Dolan:
“She told a good story about helping kids. Hell, it seemed genuine. She took my Foundation’s money and ran off to Bosnia, all over the United States, Paris, Portugal, you name it, and then she stiffed me.”
7. Dolan and her family - Her father is influential in which causes she 'adopts'- and she does seem to be in need of an almost constant supply of causes of one sort or another to support
8. Dolan contracted to Phillip Kronzer to write a report on Pedophile Catholic Priests and what Kronzer claims as the "Medjugorje Cult" to get back at his estranged ex-wife who was a Medjugorje Cult follower
More research was required as there seemed to be inconsistencies in Dolans history. Inconsistencies to which there might yet be innocent explanations. Unfortunately the second raft of data, this time from behind the scenes, was equally obscure in exonerating her past and only caused further disquiet as to her real intentions:
1. Dolan did work with several ex military and police from the UK doing intelligence work in Bosnia. Her careless actions almost compromised the case of a UN police whistleblower in a London court. According to Phillip Kronzer, Dolan had claimed she was going to, 'bust a baby selling ring operating out of Franciscan monastery in Medjugorje, Bosnia', but instead, 'she cruised the Adriatic,' and, 'had to be scooped out of the sea when she fell overboard in a drunken stupor' .
2. In another action to help abused kids, Dolan so enraged one of the victims’ family with her profanity and excessive drinking that the family became disheartened and all but gave up on Dolan as any serious means of help or support.
3. In a caper in Washington DC both she and Charlie Black with Jeff Pickett and others helped set up an entity that worked with Ed Artis and a host of other questionable entities. Quite what the legitimate purpose of this association was, noone knows.
4. Dolan has a well known drinking problem and in some cases has been spotted smashed in public even at her own functions.
Attached to this file was the following note:
WARNING
Vatican knight Phillip Kronzer lost over $300,000 to Dolan and her gang of scammers including a gang of fake British intelligence agents, a stock swindler, an accused English paedophile, blackmailer and phony priest known as Parson Pete, with a supporting cast of dozens.
Source: beirut.indymedia.org/ar/2006/06/4165.shtml
Medjugorje.
This one town immediately caused connections to be made, in particular in the area of child trafficking and child abuse, and connections in the case of Madeleine Mccann, as had already been made. Phillip Kronzers name popped up again as did mention of his missing $300,000. This was money that Dolan appeared to have conned from him. Intrigued to see if any sense could be extracted from the supplied information it was only right to look further.
To make some sense of all these disperate facts it became neccessary to start at the begining, looking here might suggest a theme. A theme that, with regards Dolan and her money making activities, might offer explanation as to her chance encounter with The Madeleine Foundation. This raised the possibility there could even be a theme with a bearing on the case of Madeleine Mccann itself. A case which Dolan, by her own confession, wanted to further embroil herself.
In 2002 Dolans first project, and the only work one could attach any integrity to, which was financed in part by Phillip Kronzers - The Foundation, was announced to the world in the following press release:
November 9 2002: For Immediate Release
Contacts:
David Roscow:703-276-2772, ext. 21
Scott Treibitz: 703-276-2772, ext. 11
News Reports:
Catholic Church Guilty of Global Human Trafficking of Sexual Predators and Victims
Vatican to Turn over All Diocesan "Historical Secret Archives" to Law Enforcement
Calls For US Congressional Hearings
International Humanitarian Campaign Against the Exploitation of Children
Press Conference:
At 1:30 pm Tuesday November 12: Holman Room, The National Press Club, (14th and F Street NW, 13th floor) Washington, DC.
The Catholic Church is guilty of a historic, systemic cover-up of human trafficking of sexual predators and victims as defined by the United Nations according to a report by the International Humanitarian Campaign Against the Exploitation of Children (IHCAEC). The report, In the Name of God, documents clear evidence of global patterns of behavior and tactics by church officials that has resulted in "global human trafficking" of sexual predators and their victims under the guise of protecting the Priesthood, the image of the Catholic Church, and avoiding legal and financial liability for their actions.
"Even in these very dark days of the Roman Catholic Church's worse sexual scandal, the Church hierarchy and the Vatican continue to co-conspire to cover-up heinous sexual crimes by members of the clergy including sexual rituals, orgies, and ritual abuse sex rings." said author of the report and former CNN Political Director Christine Dolan CEO/founder of IHCAEC.
"In this cover-up, the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy use their usual tools-Denial, Deflection, Secrecy, Stonewalling, and Blaming victims, their families and supporters, and media who attempt to report the true nature of this sexual torture. It is time for Law Enforcement agencies worldwide to do what the Roman Catholic church Hierarchy, who clearly consider themselves 'A Royal Priesthood' and above the civil laws that govern laity, to do what the Vatican and their Bishops continue to lack the moral leadership and moral courage to do. Positions of power in the church can no longer be protection from CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY! Their acts of commission and omission are as criminal as the predators' sadistic torture and savagery of children!" said Dolan.
For more information about IHCAEC visit www.helpsavekids.org.
Press Conference Participants:
* Christine Dolan - Author of the book 'In the Name of God'.
CEO and Founder of 'International Humanitarian Campaign Against the Exploitation of Children'
* Hon. Richard Seziberra - Rwandan Ambassador to the U.S.
* Father Thomas P. Doyle - O.P., J.C.D.
* Pat Roddy - Former ABC News Executive Producer
* Father John Bambrick - Priest Survivor of Clergy Sexual Abuse
* Homayra Sellier - President, Innocence in Danger - Geneva, Switzerland. Child pornography internet expert
* Linda McDonald - R.N. Ritual abuse-torture expert, Nova Scotia, Canada
* Jeanne Sarson - R.N. Ritual abuse-torture expert, Nova Scotia, Canada
* Michael Skinner - American non-Catholic survivor
* Ben Johnston - American-DynCorp trafficking whistle-blower
*END OF PRESS RELEASE
Homayra Sellier, the President of Innocence in Danger, attended this press conference. Nothing unusual in that. Selliers organisation as a long established organisation in the field might have felt the need to have a professional opinion and input with regards child sexual abuse, wether it be from the Catholic Church or otherwise. This work of Dolans, published for the first time and itemised the ritual sexual abuse that was quietly occuring in all quarters of the Catholic Church.
Protest was at last forming and it banged on the doors of the Vatican and demanded to be admitted. It became apparent to the Catholic Church that something was at last happening to stop the sexual abuse of children, abuse that had been going on for years, abuse that was widespread and endemic yet no one had so much as raised a finger to stop.
Dolans press conference, sure enough, ruffled the feathers of the good folks down at the Vatican. The Vatican concluded something had to be done. Wether it be to stop or discredit Dolan it mattered not, she had to be muzzled. The Vatican considered that if it could form an alliance with Dolan, this might at least remove some of the urgency and the poignancy of her allegations. The church would more easily survive the onslaught if it could diffuse Dolan by neutering her from within. It might then appear, in the eyes of the public at least, that the worst of the allegations which Dolan had levelled, might be rendered meaningless. The church would have hijacked the very vehicle that was making the allegations. The church would then be in the driving seat, and it would then be the church and not Dolan who was calling the shots. It would all be over very quickly, provided of course the right man could be found to catalyse the plan and make it a reality.
Needless to say just such a man already existed and he was already closely associated with Dolans work. That man was a Vatican catholic knight in the shape of Phillip Kronzer who immediately and generously stepped in to further Dolans work, with offers of yet more financial assistance. In part it must be said Kronzer already had an interest in the Balkans as he was determined to continue to persue his exwife and her association with the Medjugorje Cult. This 'real knight' was to prove to be a 'real friend' to Dolan in the coming months.
Selliers as an established and recognised force in the arena of child welfare might well have provided the cement for such a relationship with 'The Phillip Kronzer Trust', and to the many millions of dollars it had available for causes just like Dolans. Kronzer appeared to be more than happy to lend his name to the furthering of Dolans work, and should this venture of his also provide the means by which the Vatican might gain access to Dolans campaign then this was no skin off his nose.
The upshot of this sponsorship, that Kronzer provided, was that in time the Vatican effectively became the organisation, who was now in control of Dolans organisation. Now the very organisation that was making the allegations of institutionised child sex abuse against the Catholic church was itself part of the church through Kronzers alliegence. At first glance one might say, all of this is possible, but maybe it's all a little far fetched. If it really did happen in this way how, you might ask, can anyone be certain that Kronzer was indeed acting in such a way, or that the real purpose in sponsoring Dolan was to gain control and subvert her organisations aims?
Phillip Kronzer might not be all that he first appears. Kronzer has a history of hoaxes of one sort or another in Bosnia. More specificaly in the town of Medjugorje, dare I say it, he has organised financial hoaxes, even attached to the very shrine where Madeleine McCann was reported as having been sighted. This peculiar coincidence is worthy of explanation.
Kronzers association in the Balkans has been long, and has been one in which he has always vigorously championned the Vaticans cause above all others in the region. Back in 2005 there was a serious threat to the very existence of the state of Serbia, and this threat came from the Vatican. So desperate had things become that on August 27, 2005, the attorney Jonathan Levy joined with several other speakers at the Belgrade Hyatt Regency to discuss the ongoing Vatican threat and to see if some sort of resolution might be possible in the lawsuit instigated by Holocaust survivors against the Franciscan Order and Vatican Bank.
This lawsuit was primarily the subject of Jonathan Levy’s speech, but it was not possible to discuss the lawsuit without at the same time disclosing much of what had been happening in Serbia with regards the activities of the Vatican. In attendance were representatives of major Serbian political parties, the Serbian Orthodox Church, Holocaust survivors, journalists, historians, publishers, a representative of the Russian embassy, and a delegation including the Foreign Minister of the Republik Srpska Krajina.
Jonathan Levy stressed that the Vatican’s seeming invincibility to lawsuits was rapidly crumbling under an avalanche of accusations of criminal deeds both old and new including wholesale sexual abuse of children, the murder of banker of Roberto Calvi, forced conversions in Krajina in the 1990’s, the exposure of the fraudulent shrine of Medjugorje in Bosnia which was used to launder millions of dollars. This money it turned out was then used to finance the purchase of arms, which were used to kill Serbs in the 1990’s.
There had been a catalogue of financial misconduct in the area with the con man Martin Frankel. There had also been revelations from President Milosevic and Vice President Seselj at the Hague Tribunal in which the Vatican’s geopolitical aims in the region had become known to all. As if this wasn't enough there was of course the money laundering of the Ustasha Treasury by the Vatican Bank. Shortly after this allegation first surfaced, the United Nations Criminal Tribunal accused the Vatican and Franciscans of harboring the major Croatian war criminal, Ante Gotavica, by allowing him refuge in a Franciscan monastery in Croatia.
The inescapable conclusion of the meeting was that the current Vatican administration must make ammends, and these ammends would have to be on a huge scale to compensate for past misdeeds against the Serbian people. It became clear that this must be done before there could be any form of political reconciliation in the Balkans. The plotters, Levy assured the audience, at the Vatican do not represent the mainstream of the Catholic Church, the bulk of which, he assured his audience remain horrified at the crimes being committed and covered up in their name.
Phillip Kronzer, a Catholic Knight of the Order of St. Michael was present at this meeting. Kronzer told a most moving story of Franciscan misdeeds against his own family. Kronzer then apologized publicly for the Medjugorje hoax, and the money laundering activities of the Vatican in the region. Then he apologised for the genocidal activities of the Croatian Franciscans in Bosnia and Krajina.
As a testimony to the inner workings of the Vatican, and Kronzers credentials, as a Knight of the Order of St. Michael, a SNOM, Kronzer would most certainly also be a Free Mason. This is the only way to achieve such status. The Vatican and Free Masonry share a long and chequered past, a past which testifies to riddles and deception, and one where each organisation seems perfectly suited to fulfilling the others bent and twisted aims and intentions.
There is one final shadow that persists when looking at the evidence above, and that is the appearance of Dolans name with the town of Medjugorje. When the Madeleine McCann case first broke Sellier was one of the Mccanns most loyal and vociferous of allies. Her web pages, painted in blood red, were a vivid portrayal of the nightmare horrors of child sexual abuse. On one of her pages there is a video describing (fictiously) child sex abuse. This video verges on the repugnant and to most people who see it, it only forces them to consider what sort of sinister mindset it was that conceived and then created such a video.
The Mccanns through their Free Mason friend Kronzer had found in Sellier a most loyal and faithfull proponent for their own special brand of child abduction. Sellier was totally committed and fully behind the Mccanns as from the 7th of May she publicly attached herself to the abduction story, in an attempt to add credibility to the Mccanns. Selliers enthuiasm alone, to say or do anything, to authenticate the Mccanns version of events combined with Kronzers money and local connections meant that organising a sighting of Madeleine herself, would be something they could organise with their hands tied behind their backs.
A sighting would prove the Mccanns were right. Even if it were later to be shown, as it surely had to be, a hoax, the Mccanns could only benefit from the telling of such a story. The press would reinforce the sighting with pictures and hyperbole so much so that by the time it was over, people would only remember there was the possibility that Madeleine was still alive, and that was all that was required. Selliers actions, and those of others like her, with other sightings around the globe, would unceasingly manufacture in the publics imagination something that plainly could not be.
Once generated, this possibility, however short lived, allowed the Mccanns, as parents, to continue to tell their abduction theory without the fear of criticism or contradiction.
“Our main worry, obviously, was people believing that Madeleine was dead." Kate Mccann
The second lie is used to reinforced the first lie and in doing so this made the Mccanns version of events oddly plausable. It's illogical, and it's totally flawed, but such is the way of the human psyche, it allows such opposites to combine, and in doing so, says to the observer they make sense.
By November 2007 we were all more than a little jaundiced with the press claims of yet another sighting of Madeleine McCann. The Medjugorje sightings were different in this regard. They were manufactured with such ingenuity that it was inevitable they would catch our jaded attention, but far more importantly, they would capture our belief. The sightings were unique for being amongst the most far fetched of the Madeleine McCann 'apparitions'. There were unique in that Madeliene appeared in spirit and disappeared as a will 'o' the whisp. At the beginning in the first reports there was nothing concrete like a body, but then they do things differently in Bosnia, and aparitions are quite their thing. Here are two of the warm up reports of Madeleines visitation to Bosnia:
The Express
'Big Hunt in Bosnia Delayed'
Detectives in the town of Medjugorje, near Mostar, said they could not begin looking for Madeleine until all the official procedures had been completed. Friends of the McCanns described the delay as frustrating and petty following a sighting of the four-year-old at a Roman Catholic shrine by a British tourist.
AND there was this:
Mario Bosnjak, a regional police spokesman, said:
“Every single policeman in Medjugorje has denied receiving any kind of a report regarding the missing British girl. We are ready to take an active role in the case if we received a proper report.”
Which led a 'friend of the McCanns' to say this:
“It is frustrating that there have been delays in following up this sighting. It is important they are all taken seriously.”
*END OF REPORT
The Daily Star
'Maddie Sighting was a Cruel Hoax'
Regional police spokesman Mario Bosnjak said: “Every single policeman has denied receiving any kind of a report regarding the missing girl. And no-one from the British or Portuguese authorities has contacted us regarding the case.
A police source said:
"It is a mystery within a mystery. The first place for anyone who sees Madeleine to go is to the police, yet we have not heard from this man who says he saw her. He is a religious man. Maybe it was a vision.”
There was no quote from a 'friend of the McCanns'.
*END OF REPORT
That Dolan, Sellier and Kronzer were all involved in this trickery or sleight of hand, on behalf of the Mccanns, seems quite beyond doubt. Simply too many coincidences, too many egos and too many reasons 300,000 to be precise, for this not to be the case. But it didn't end here. The cry had gone up for a picture of this apparition, so a picture had to be produced. This would provide the flesh and bones for Madeliene.
Finally, and a little unsurprisingly, it must be said, it was the The Mail, the Mccann familys most favorite read, which passed on a car registration number to the local police for investigation. This was the registration number of the car that Madeleine, according to their reports and their reports alone, described Madeleine as having being bundled into. The police were grateful The Mail were on hand, and it was The Mail that was then able to tout itself as the first newspaper able to provide the first photograph of a little girl who in truth was, 'theirs'. She was The Mails Lookalike which allowed everyone else to believe in the possibility that Madeleine McCann lived. Very bizarre but very true:
The Mail
'First picture of three-year-old Bosnian girl mistaken for missing Madeleine'
Hopes that Madeleine McCann had been found in Bosnia have been dashed after police tracked down the local girl behind the apparent sighting. Tea Dedic, three, was found by detectives after the Daily Mail provided them with the number plate of the car she was apparently seen being bundled into.
*END OF REPORT
Hoax or vision take your pick. Now that The Mail had produced the essential picture the public had no reason to question the integrity of the news or the integrity of people, who for various reasons, one of them being the small matter of $300,000, remained quite unbeknown, and yet who were at one and the same time, quite literaly making the news.
Dolan of course could never verify the Medjugorje Cult which Kronzer had engaged her to investigate. Medjugorje is fertile land, and at the same time one of shifting sands. It is a place in the throws of constant turmoil, namely a fight for control between Serb and Croatian mobs. The Vatican has a hand in this too. The town of Medjugorje is not just a powerplay between locals but is a town which remains at all times within the grasp or control of Kronzer and the Vatican.
In the light of Dolans and Kronzers financial association, where Kronzer a Vatican Knight and Free Mason, egged on and encouraged Sellier to support the Mccanns, one is left thinking, it is really any wonder Dolan was so very eager, to meet a representative of The Madeleine Foundation... after all $300,000 doesn't just grow on trees you know.
