Language Is A Virus

Jeremy Rifkin Quotes

Jeremy Rifkin Quotes & Quotations
Name:
Jeremy Rifkin
Type:
Economist
Nationality:
American
Birth day:
Birth year:

  • 1
    A refuge is supposed to prevent what? The genes from flowing out of sight? This refuge idea won't stop insects from moving across boundaries. That's absurd. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 2
    Back in the mid-1980s, congressional hearings were held after we brought this litigation, and held up the first experiment. At that time, I went in front of Congress, along with the major agencies involved with this. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 3
    Europe will not accept genetically modified foods. It doesn't make any difference in the final analysis what Brussels does, what Washington does, or what the World Trade Organization does. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 4
    Here we are 17 years later. Those agencies never did come through. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 5
    I wanted to make sure that this be the first scientific and technology revolution in history in which the public thoroughly discussed all the potential benefits and all the potential harms, in advance of the technology coming online and running its course. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 6
    If your corn has a herbicide-tolerant gene, it means you can spray your herbicides and kill the weeds; you won't kill your corn because it's producing a gene that makes it tolerant of the herbicide. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 7
    In this country, the health concerns and the environmental concerns are as deep as in Europe. All the surveys show that. But here, we didn't have the cultural dimension. This is a fast-food culture. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 8
    It may be that everything the life science companies are telling us will turn out to be right, and there's no problem here whatsoever. That defies logic. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 9
    Many of the genetically modified foods will be safe, I'm sure. Will most of them be safe? Nobody knows. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 10
    Many of the mainstream agricultural scientists, especially at the agricultural schools, but at all of our major universities, are tied into all sorts of contractual relationships and consulting relationships with the life science companies. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 11
    One thing I've learned over these last 30 or 40 years is that people make history. There's no fait accompli to any of this. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 12
    The 10 largest antitrust law firms in the United States have gone into the federal courts charging Monsanto with creating a global conspiracy in violation of the antitrust laws, to control the global market in seeds. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 13
    The American public is not aware that there might be potential allergenic and toxic reactions. With regular food, at least people know which foods they have an allergy to. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 14
    The antitrust litigation currently in the federal courts in the U.S. against Monsanto will be the test case in the life sciences, just as the Microsoft case was the test case in the information sciences. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 15
    The electronic media introduced this idea to the larger audience very, very quickly. We spent years and years and years meeting with activists all over Europe to lay the groundwork for a political response, as we did here. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 16
    The industry's not stupid. The industry knows that if those foods are labeled "genetically engineered," the public will shy away and won't take them. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 17
    The insurance companies aren't covering that. Should Monsanto be liable for these losses? Should the state government? Who's going to cover the losses? The fact is, here's an industry with no long-term liability in place. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 18
    The interesting thing is, while we die of diseases of affluence from eating all these fatty meats, our poor brethren in the developing world die of diseases of poverty, because the land is not used now to grow food grain for their families. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 19
    The public should know that the liability issues here have yet to be resolved, or even raised. If you're a farmer and you're growing a genetically engineering food crop, those genes are going to flow to the other farm. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 20
    They're now turning those seeds into intellectual property, so they have a virtual lock on the seeds upon which we all depend for our food and survival. Jeremy_RifkinJeremy Rifkin
  • 21
    We are already producing enough food to feed the world. We already have technology in place that allows us to produce more than we can find a market for. Jeremy_Rifkin/21.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 22
    We are entering a new phase in human history - one in which fewer and fewer workers will be needed to produce the goods and services for the global population. Jeremy_Rifkin/22.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 23
    We now have an opportunity, though, to do something we didn't do in the industrial age, and that is to get a leg up on this, to bring the public in quickly, to have an informed debate. Jeremy_Rifkin/23.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 24
    We were making the first step out of the age of chemistry and physics, and into the age of biology. Jeremy_Rifkin/24.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 25
    What I'm suggesting to you is that this could be a renaissance. We may be on the cusp of a future which could provide a tremendous leap forward for humanity. Jeremy_Rifkin/25.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 26
    What the public needs to understand is that these new technologies, especially in recombinant DNA technology, allow scientists to bypass biological boundaries altogether. Jeremy_Rifkin/26.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 27
    What's different here is that we have now technologies that allow these life science companies to bypass classical breeding. That's what makes it both powerful and exciting. Jeremy_Rifkin/27.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 28
    When you introduce a genetically modified organism into the environment, it's not like introducing a chemical product, or even a nuclear product. Jeremy_Rifkin/28.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 29
    You can eliminate, for example, a Brazil nut gene if you know that it will create an allergenic effect. Jeremy_Rifkin/29.php">Jeremy Rifkin
  • 30
    You can't get a guarantee that genes are going to turn on and off the way you want them to. You're dealing with life. It's too unpredictable. Jeremy_Rifkin/30.php">Jeremy Rifkin